As a career marketing veteran, I can appreciate the necessity of holiday advertising, the same way I know that political candidates need to run negative campaign ads; somehow it is justified as a contributor to positive end results.
Despite the tens of millions of dollars spent on holiday advertising, no one is tempting me with anything I want for Christmas. The marketing campaigns that make the least sense to me are:
- Cars as presents. Does anyone know anyone who actually has given someone a car for Christmas? If it's only the fabled 1% (or less) that the auto manufacturers are targeting, surely there's a more direct way to reach them? I guess the only people who would be enticed by the suggestion that cars make good presents are those who are looking for a vehicle to drive over the fiscal cliff.
- Jewelry = love. For three years now, people have been holding back on making replacement purchases on things that are necessities, like appliances, cars, even shoes, while waiting for the economy to turn around. If I were to spend hundreds of dollars for a special necklace for my wife, I'm quite sure that her reaction would not be astonished gratitude and amplified feelings of love. More likely it would be a suspicion that I have lost all sense of reality (or that I'm guilty of something and trying to create a diversion).
The appropriate level of ad testing would likely uncover this double-edged sword, but I suspect that most agencies would eschew the need for testing because they are oblivious to the negative consequences.
If you have insights to add to this conversation, please join in.